Imagine this fairly typical scenario: A course has four assessments. Three of them are written assessments. All three have marks awarded for general writing skills
LEARNING DESIGN by Paul G Moss
hypotheses
Imagine this fairly typical scenario: A course has four assessments. Three of them are written assessments. All three have marks awarded for general writing skills
Yes! But only with a very large caveat: when constructive alignment is correctly employed! This is the 4th post in a series on constructive alignment.
In a previous post, I discussed Sadler’s (2005) admonitory observation of aggregating grades as a proxy for outcome attainment. Careful design, however, including signalling which
If we believe there is an acceptable spectrum of AI influence on assessments that are not secure, as Curtis (2025) argues, we must carefully consider
This is the third post in a series on constructive alignment. The first is here. Constructive alignment is a curriculum design principle grounded in constructivist
In a previous post, I discussed the need to consider the logistical and pedagogical implications of running an oral assessment as an extra assurance that